European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

Most quality control programs in blood banking are concerned exclusively with control of research center testing and staff and don't assess different region of the blood donation center or decide the capability of all work force in the presentation of administrative assignments. To accomplish the last objectives in our quality control program, during a 15-month time frame, 1,143 purposeful mistakes were placed into routine parts of all blood donation center exercises and afterward painstakingly checked and controlled. Of 498, 400, and 245 mistakes shipped off the workplace, nursing, and lab regions, separately, 12 (2.4%), 58 (14.5%), and 29 (11.8%) blunders were not recognized. Presentation of this program was likewise joined by a huge expansion in the quantity of genuine blunders that were distinguished and probably had not recently been perceived. The quantity of genuine blunders identified expanded from 4 to 43 to 73 during months 0 to 6, 7 to 12, and 13 to 15 of this review. Examination and recording of every blunder on an Error Report Form has allowed assessment of both faculty and frameworks and ensuing execution of restorative activity

Blood transfusion services are the most important part of modern health care system and
maintaining the adequate supply of safe blood is an ever challenging job for blood banks. The
most important is the selection of blood donors by donor selection criteria. Blood donor
deferral is a very painful and sad experience, but retaining them for future is a very
challenging job. Hence we studied the current rate and various reasons and demographic
pattern for donor deferral in this blood bank. Study of deferral of blood donor at collection
site and donor blood deferral in blood bank will be worthwhile and enlightening. It will help
in taking corrective measures and improving strategies for donor motivation.