• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 9, Issue 2
  3. Author

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume9, Issue2

A comparative study of oral V/S vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor conducted at Karwar institute of medical science, Karwar, Karnataka

    Dr. Shivanand Kudtarkar, Dr. Annappa Shetty, Kishan Kudtakar

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022, Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 332-336

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Objective: To study the efficacy of 50 μg of Misoprostol tablet for induction of labor, oral v/s vaginal
route.
Methods: 100 women, at term gestation, with various indication for induction of labor with Bishop’s
score of ≤4 were included. After deciding, 50 women received 50 μg orally and 50 women received 50
μg vaginally every fourth hourly (maximum of 6 doses) or till they went into active labor.
Results: After statistical analysis it was found that in vaginal misoprostol route the induction to delivery
interval was significantly less compared to oral misoprostol group (9.5 v/s 160).
It was also found that the required dose of drug in vaginal route is less compared to oral route (40% of
women need only 2 doses in vaginal group compared to 35% of oral group were 6 doses required).
Conclusion: For induction of labor vaginal misoprostol is always more effective compared to oral rout
Keywords:
    misoprostol vaginal misoprostol oral misoprostol labor induction
  • PDF (442 K)
  • XML
(2022). A comparative study of oral V/S vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor conducted at Karwar institute of medical science, Karwar, Karnataka. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(2), 332-336.
Dr. Shivanand Kudtarkar, Dr. Annappa Shetty, Kishan Kudtakar. "A comparative study of oral V/S vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor conducted at Karwar institute of medical science, Karwar, Karnataka". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9, 2, 2022, 332-336.
(2022). 'A comparative study of oral V/S vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor conducted at Karwar institute of medical science, Karwar, Karnataka', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(2), pp. 332-336.
A comparative study of oral V/S vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor conducted at Karwar institute of medical science, Karwar, Karnataka. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022; 9(2): 332-336.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 99
  • PDF Download: 150
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus