• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 9, Issue 3
  3. Author

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume9, Issue3

A comparative study of stapler hemorrhoidectomy and open hemorrhoidectomy

    Dr Devender Grover, Dr Irum Jawaid

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022, Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 388-392

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Background:There are different systems utilized in the careful treatment of
hemorrhoidal ailment. The present study was conducted to compare stapler
hemorrhoidectomy and open hemorrhoidectomy.
Materials & Methods: 70 hemorrhoids patients of both genders were divided into 2
groups. Group I was stapler hemorrhoidectomy group (SH) and group II was Open
(Milligan Morgan) hemorrhoidectomy group (OH). Operating time (mins), first bowel
movement (hours), return to normal daily activities (days), pain and complications.
Results: Group I comprised of 25 males and 10 females and group II had 18 males and
17 females. Operating time (mins) was 24.3 in group I and 18.1 in group II, first bowel
movement (hours) was 19.2 in group I and 34.6 in group II, return to normal daily
activities (days) was 5.7 in group I and 7.2 in group II and VAS was 26.2 in group I
and 50.8 in group II. Complications was bleeding seen in 1 in group I and 2 in group II,
urinary retention 4 in group I and 5 in group II and bleeding and urinary retention 2 in
group I and 1 in group II. The difference was significant (P< 0.05).
Conclusion: Operative time, duration of hospital stay and return to normal activity
were satisfactory with stapler hemorrhoidectomy than the open method.
Keywords:
    stapler hemorrhoidectomy open method Milligan Morgan
  • PDF (179 K)
  • XML
(2022). A comparative study of stapler hemorrhoidectomy and open hemorrhoidectomy. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(3), 388-392.
Dr Devender Grover, Dr Irum Jawaid. "A comparative study of stapler hemorrhoidectomy and open hemorrhoidectomy". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9, 3, 2022, 388-392.
(2022). 'A comparative study of stapler hemorrhoidectomy and open hemorrhoidectomy', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(3), pp. 388-392.
A comparative study of stapler hemorrhoidectomy and open hemorrhoidectomy. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022; 9(3): 388-392.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 91
  • PDF Download: 139
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus