• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 9, Issue 2
  3. Author

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume9, Issue2

TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE TRADITIONAL TRIPLE ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST LESIONS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.

    Dr. Manoj Srivastava, Dr. Nishee Srivastava

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022, Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 2613-2616

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Background & Method: The aim of this study is to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the traditional triple assessment of symptomatic breast lesions with contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. patients with palpable breast lesions were recruited from the symptomatic breast clinics. All underwent clinical examination by consultant breast surgeons, FNAC was performed according to our standard protocol for symptomatic patients, which does not include image guidance.
 
Result: MRI proved to most sensitive and specific modality. Triple assessment MRI and FNAC all have specificity of 100%. MRI proved to be most sensitive modality with 96 % sensitivity, (physical examination 91%, USG 91%, FNAC 84% and Triple assessment 84 %.)
 
Conclusion: With the aim of improving the accuracy of triple assessment, MRI can provide valuable information and with improvements in technology can further enhance specificity. Contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is as sensitive and more specific than the combined traditional triple assessment for the diagnosis of malignant breast lesions.
Keywords:
    Sensitivity Specificity breast lesions & MRI
  • PDF (255 K)
  • XML
(2022). TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE TRADITIONAL TRIPLE ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST LESIONS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(2), 2613-2616.
Dr. Manoj Srivastava, Dr. Nishee Srivastava. "TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE TRADITIONAL TRIPLE ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST LESIONS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9, 2, 2022, 2613-2616.
(2022). 'TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE TRADITIONAL TRIPLE ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST LESIONS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(2), pp. 2613-2616.
TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE TRADITIONAL TRIPLE ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST LESIONS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022; 9(2): 2613-2616.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 64
  • PDF Download: 36
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus