• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  1. Home
  2. TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE TRADITIONAL TRIPLE ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST LESIONS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE TRADITIONAL TRIPLE ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST LESIONS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.

    Author

    • Dr. Manoj Srivastava, Dr. Nishee Srivastava
,

Document Type : Research Article

  • Article Information
  • Download
  • Export Citation
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Background & Method: The aim of this study is to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the traditional triple assessment of symptomatic breast lesions with contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. patients with palpable breast lesions were recruited from the symptomatic breast clinics. All underwent clinical examination by consultant breast surgeons, FNAC was performed according to our standard protocol for symptomatic patients, which does not include image guidance.
 
Result: MRI proved to most sensitive and specific modality. Triple assessment MRI and FNAC all have specificity of 100%. MRI proved to be most sensitive modality with 96 % sensitivity, (physical examination 91%, USG 91%, FNAC 84% and Triple assessment 84 %.)
 
Conclusion: With the aim of improving the accuracy of triple assessment, MRI can provide valuable information and with improvements in technology can further enhance specificity. Contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is as sensitive and more specific than the combined traditional triple assessment for the diagnosis of malignant breast lesions.

Keywords

  • sensitivity
  • specificity
  • breast
  • lesions & MRI
  • XML
  • PDF 255.06 K
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • VANCOUVER
    • Article View: 89
    • PDF Download: 63
European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine
Volume 9, Issue 2
February 2022
Page 2613-2616
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 255.06 K
Share
Export Citation
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 89
  • PDF Download: 63

APA

Srivastava, D. M. S. D. N. (2022). TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE TRADITIONAL TRIPLE ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST LESIONS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(2), 2613-2616.

MLA

Dr. Manoj Srivastava, Dr. Nishee Srivastava. "TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE TRADITIONAL TRIPLE ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST LESIONS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9, 2, 2022, 2613-2616.

HARVARD

Srivastava, D. M. S. D. N. (2022). 'TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE TRADITIONAL TRIPLE ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST LESIONS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(2), pp. 2613-2616.

VANCOUVER

Srivastava, D. M. S. D. N. TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE TRADITIONAL TRIPLE ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST LESIONS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022; 9(2): 2613-2616.

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Glossary
  • Sitemap

News

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by ejournalplus