• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 9, Issue 4
  3. Author

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume9, Issue4

OUTCOMES OF A SINGLE LEVEL TLIF WITH A LOCAL MORSELIZED IMPACTED BONE TRANSPLANT VERSUS A CAGE WITH A LOCAL BONE GRAFT

    Ananda Kumar Behera, Deepak Rohella, Abhimanyu Madhual, Bibhudatta Malla, Sunil Dash

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022, Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 2932-2938

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Background: When degenerative spinal illnesses result in neuropathic backache, nerve root decompression with instrumented interbody fusion is the preferred treatment for these groups of patients.
Methods: A hospital-based, comparative, retrospective analysis of patients who had transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with either a cage with bone graft or a stand-alone autologous morselized bone graft was conducted. The clinical and radiological outcomes of these two interbody fusion procedures were evaluated to see if there was a meaningful difference. A total of 20 patients with lumbar canal stenosis and degenerative grade 1/2 spondylolisthesis who had failed conservative management were operated on using the TLIF approach and were evaluated for postoperative improvement in the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and interbody fusion on imaging at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Each patient's vertebral level of surgical intervention, intra-operative blood loss, and operation duration, as well as any complications, were noted.
Results: There was no significant difference in clinical or radiological result between the two modalities of interbody fusion in our study. Although the group that received morselized bone graft with cage had a somewhat better clinical outcome at 6 months, there was no meaningful difference in ODI at 1 year.
Conclusions: Based on the findings of this study, we can infer that both procedures have similar clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as similar patient satisfaction, and can be used interchangeably for interbody fusion depending on the surgeon's and patient's preferences.
Keywords:
    Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Morselized bone graft Cage Oswestry disability index
  • PDF (108 K)
  • XML
(2022). OUTCOMES OF A SINGLE LEVEL TLIF WITH A LOCAL MORSELIZED IMPACTED BONE TRANSPLANT VERSUS A CAGE WITH A LOCAL BONE GRAFT. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(4), 2932-2938.
Ananda Kumar Behera, Deepak Rohella, Abhimanyu Madhual, Bibhudatta Malla, Sunil Dash. "OUTCOMES OF A SINGLE LEVEL TLIF WITH A LOCAL MORSELIZED IMPACTED BONE TRANSPLANT VERSUS A CAGE WITH A LOCAL BONE GRAFT". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9, 4, 2022, 2932-2938.
(2022). 'OUTCOMES OF A SINGLE LEVEL TLIF WITH A LOCAL MORSELIZED IMPACTED BONE TRANSPLANT VERSUS A CAGE WITH A LOCAL BONE GRAFT', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(4), pp. 2932-2938.
OUTCOMES OF A SINGLE LEVEL TLIF WITH A LOCAL MORSELIZED IMPACTED BONE TRANSPLANT VERSUS A CAGE WITH A LOCAL BONE GRAFT. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022; 9(4): 2932-2938.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 39
  • PDF Download: 48
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus