• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 9, Issue 7
  3. Author

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume9, Issue7

A Comparison Of Magnesium Sulphate and Dexmedetomidine for Control Of Shivering in Neuraxial Anaesthesia

    Dr.Pavani Bussa, Dr. Mude Anand Babu Naik, Dr. Shaik Vahida, Dr. Zareena Shaik

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022, Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages 5871-5879

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Shivering is one of the most common complications of neuraxial blockade. Some patients find shivering sensation worse than surgical pain. Therefore, both prevention and treatment of established shivering should be regarded as clinically relevant intervention in the perioperative period.
AIM: The present study was done to evaluate and compare the efficacy, hemodynamics and adverse effects of Magnesium sulphate and Dexmedetomidine when used for control of intra operative shivering during neuraxial anaesthesia.
Materials And Method: A prospective double blind study was conducted by enrolling 253 patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under neuraxial anesthesia in age group 20 to 60year with written informed consent. Patients developing intraop shivering were randomly divided into two groups Group A (50patients)- received Magnesium sulphate 50mg/kg IV bolus and Group B (50patients)- received Dexmedetomidine 0.5microgram/kg IV. Study was done until 50 patients were studied by both the study groups.
Results: The study shows a highly statistically significant difference (P value 0.001) between both groups in terms of heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, core body temperature, time to disappearance of shivering and mean respiratory rate between both the groups.
Conclusion: In the above study Dexmedetomidine was more efficacious than Magnesium sulphate interms of maintaining hemodynamics and control of shivering in neuraxial anaesthesia.
Keywords:
    Dexmedetomidine Magnesium sulphate Neuraxial anaesthesia intra operative Shivering
  • PDF (755 K)
  • XML
(2022). A Comparison Of Magnesium Sulphate and Dexmedetomidine for Control Of Shivering in Neuraxial Anaesthesia. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(7), 5871-5879.
Dr.Pavani Bussa, Dr. Mude Anand Babu Naik, Dr. Shaik Vahida, Dr. Zareena Shaik. "A Comparison Of Magnesium Sulphate and Dexmedetomidine for Control Of Shivering in Neuraxial Anaesthesia". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9, 7, 2022, 5871-5879.
(2022). 'A Comparison Of Magnesium Sulphate and Dexmedetomidine for Control Of Shivering in Neuraxial Anaesthesia', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(7), pp. 5871-5879.
A Comparison Of Magnesium Sulphate and Dexmedetomidine for Control Of Shivering in Neuraxial Anaesthesia. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022; 9(7): 5871-5879.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 7
  • PDF Download: 37
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus