• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 9, Issue 8
  3. Authors

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume9, Issue8

Comparison Of The Traditional Suturing Technique Versus Continuous Non-Locking For Repair Of Episiotomy Using Polyglactin 910.

    Pankaj Prakash Salvi Vidya Gaikwad Jaya Sravani Ankem Swati Ghonge

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022, Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages 1380-1387
10.48047/ejmcm.v09.i08.1380

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: The present study was designed with the primary aim to compare the Traditional Suturing Technique versus Continuous Non-Locking technique for Repair of Episiotomy Using Treated Polyglactin 910.
Materials and Methods: A total of 100 postnatal women complying with study inclusion criteria were included and randomly divided into two groups viz. traditional suturing technique using polyglactin 910 (Group A) and continuous non-locking technique using polyglactin 910 (Group B). A detailed clinical evaluation was done for all the subjects. Appropriate and relevant investigations were done.
Results: Regarding the pain assessment by VAS score and episiotomy healing by REEDA score both the groups were not significant (p-value >0.05), hence no difference was noted among them. However continuous non locking technique consumed less number of suture materials and less time as its p- value was <0.05, which was significant.
Conclusion: According to REEDA score and VAS score, there was no significant difference in episiotomy healing and pain assessment respectively. Continuous Non-Locking Technique of the episiotomy wound had less perineal pain on day 1, consumes less number of suture materials and less time, hence it was economically better when compared to Traditional Suturing technique.
Keywords:
    Episiotomy traditional suturing continuous non- locking suturing Routine care REEDA score VAS
  • PDF (319 K)
  • XML
(2022). Comparison Of The Traditional Suturing Technique Versus Continuous Non-Locking For Repair Of Episiotomy Using Polyglactin 910.. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(8), 1380-1387. doi: 10.48047/ejmcm.v09.i08.1380
Pankaj Prakash Salvi; Vidya Gaikwad; Jaya Sravani Ankem; Swati Ghonge. "Comparison Of The Traditional Suturing Technique Versus Continuous Non-Locking For Repair Of Episiotomy Using Polyglactin 910.". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9, 8, 2022, 1380-1387. doi: 10.48047/ejmcm.v09.i08.1380
(2022). 'Comparison Of The Traditional Suturing Technique Versus Continuous Non-Locking For Repair Of Episiotomy Using Polyglactin 910.', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(8), pp. 1380-1387. doi: 10.48047/ejmcm.v09.i08.1380
Comparison Of The Traditional Suturing Technique Versus Continuous Non-Locking For Repair Of Episiotomy Using Polyglactin 910.. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022; 9(8): 1380-1387. doi: 10.48047/ejmcm.v09.i08.1380
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 34
  • PDF Download: 31
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus