• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 9, Issue 7
  3. Author

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume9, Issue7

Evaluation of Distractor Effectiveness of Single Best Response type of Multiple Choice Questions by item Analysis

    Dr. Anupam Suhas Khare,Dr. Archana Akshay Kadam, Dr. Amita Verma, Dr. Ketankumar L Gandhi

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022, Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages 8624-8628

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Background: The most reliable format of objective evaluation is multiple choice questions (MCQs) which ideally should be drawn from a question bank of valid and tested items/MCQs.  Distractor effectiveness is one of the most important tool to assess the quality and validity of a MCQ. Items with known functional distractors form an important part of assessment in MCQ test paper.
Objectives: The objectives of the study were to find out distractor effectiveness for each item in a physiology MCQ test paper.
Materials and methods: Physiology MCQ test paper comprising of 40 items, with answer key and answer papers of 198 first MBBS students were obtained. Choice marked for each item by each student and his scores were entered in Microsoft Excel. Students were ranked & top 1/3rd and bottom 1/3rd were chosen as high achiever and low achiever group respectively. Distractor effectiveness for each item was determined using appropriate formula.
Results: Out of 120 distractors, 97 (80.83%) were functional distractors. 16 items had in all 23 (19.17%) non-functional distractors. 24 items had all functional distractors,10 items had 1 non-functional distractor, 5 items had 2 non-functional distractors and 1 item had 3 non-functional distractors. All other distractors for each item were acceptable.
Conclusion: Valid items with functional distractors can be incorporated in item bank. Items with non-functional distractors should be revised.
Keywords:
    Distractor effectiveness Item analysis
  • PDF (231 K)
  • XML
(2022). Evaluation of Distractor Effectiveness of Single Best Response type of Multiple Choice Questions by item Analysis. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(7), 8624-8628.
Dr. Anupam Suhas Khare,Dr. Archana Akshay Kadam, Dr. Amita Verma, Dr. Ketankumar L Gandhi. "Evaluation of Distractor Effectiveness of Single Best Response type of Multiple Choice Questions by item Analysis". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9, 7, 2022, 8624-8628.
(2022). 'Evaluation of Distractor Effectiveness of Single Best Response type of Multiple Choice Questions by item Analysis', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 9(7), pp. 8624-8628.
Evaluation of Distractor Effectiveness of Single Best Response type of Multiple Choice Questions by item Analysis. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2022; 9(7): 8624-8628.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 5
  • PDF Download: 10
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus