• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 10, Issue 1
  3. Author

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume10, Issue1

COMPARISON OF SUB ARACHNOID BLOCK WITH 26/27G SPINAL NEEDLE WITH OR WITHOUT INTRODUCER (21G SHORT INTRODUCER NEEDLE) :PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY”

    Dr. (Brig.) Vipul K. Sharma, Dr.Anilin Joey, Dr.Johnson subash

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2023, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 1968-1977

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

To Compare the ease of insertion of 26/27G spinal needle with and without short introducer (21G) needle while giving sub arachnoid block(SAB), to assess the number of attempts and the duration of procedure.
Background:
SAB is one of the commonest techniques used in anesthetic practice for obstetric patients and other infra umbilical procedures.          One of it’s most distressing complication is post dural puncture headache(PDPH). Smaller gauge and pencil point needles are designed to reduce PDPH. A 21G introducer needle can be used as a tool for stabilization as it allows for the placement of a fine gauge needle of 26G/27G during SAB. Such needles are used to reduce the incidence of PDPH.
Method:
40 patients who required SAB for infra umbilical procedure were included in this randomized control study. 20 patients were randomly allotted in each group. Group A included patients requiring SAB given with an introducer needle and Group B included patients requiring SAB but without an introducer needle. The ease of insertion, number of attempts and duration of the procedures was assessed. Data was compared using Fisher’s exact test.
Results:
 Analysis of results revealed that while performing SAB ease of insertion was better with introducer needle (P=0.019 ,Group A 95% & Group B 60%) and there is no significant difference in number of attempts between both the groups(P=0.069) and no significant difference in the duration of performing SAB (mean±SD:47.8±9.4 group A vs 46.7±10.7 group B/P=0.7).
Conclusion:
The use of an introducer needle with fine gauge spinal needle for SAB was resulted in easier insertion for obstetrics and all infra umbilical surgical procedures
Keywords:
  • PDF (861 K)
  • XML
(2023). COMPARISON OF SUB ARACHNOID BLOCK WITH 26/27G SPINAL NEEDLE WITH OR WITHOUT INTRODUCER (21G SHORT INTRODUCER NEEDLE) :PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY”. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 10(1), 1968-1977.
Dr. (Brig.) Vipul K. Sharma, Dr.Anilin Joey, Dr.Johnson subash. "COMPARISON OF SUB ARACHNOID BLOCK WITH 26/27G SPINAL NEEDLE WITH OR WITHOUT INTRODUCER (21G SHORT INTRODUCER NEEDLE) :PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY”". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 10, 1, 2023, 1968-1977.
(2023). 'COMPARISON OF SUB ARACHNOID BLOCK WITH 26/27G SPINAL NEEDLE WITH OR WITHOUT INTRODUCER (21G SHORT INTRODUCER NEEDLE) :PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY”', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 10(1), pp. 1968-1977.
COMPARISON OF SUB ARACHNOID BLOCK WITH 26/27G SPINAL NEEDLE WITH OR WITHOUT INTRODUCER (21G SHORT INTRODUCER NEEDLE) :PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY”. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2023; 10(1): 1968-1977.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 2
  • PDF Download: 39
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus