• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 10, Issue 1
  3. Author

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume10, Issue1

Evaluation Of Post-Partum IUCD (PPIUCD) Versus Interval IUCD (380A) Insertion

    Dr. Parul Sharma, Dr. Kamakshi Mam, Dr. Mehak Khazanchi, Dr. Vanshika Gupta, Dr. Saagar Anand, Dr. Amita Gupta, Dr. Gokul Sharma .

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2023, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 2612-2617

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Background: This study compares PPIUCD and interval IUCD, two forms of contraception that can be used throughout the postpartum period to provide long-term and effective contraception.
Methods: The 300 study participants were split into two groups i.e. 150 women in the postpartum group; intrapartum or within 10 minutes; caesarean section; or within 48 hours of delivery and after six weeks of birth or postmenstrual; interval group 150. The experiment employed Cu T 380A. Between 48 hours and 6 weeks after delivery, chorioaminionitis, PROM >18 hours, unresolved PPH, and puerperal sepsis were contraindications for PPIUCD. All of them were monitored for six months.
Results: The continuation rate in the interval group was 81.81% at 6 months, compared to 88.23% in the postpartum group. 15.33% of cases after PPIUCD and 19.33% of cases following interval IUCD experienced complications. When compared to interval insertions, the expulsion rate in PPIUCD was significantly greater (6.96% v/s 2.2%; p value < 0.05). In both groups, the removal rate of IUCD was practically identical (4% in PPIUCD v/s 6.0% in interval).
Conclusions: PPIUCD, regardless of the route of delivery, is a postpartum contraceptive strategy that is efficient, safe, practical, affordable, and long-lasting.
Keywords:
    Cu T Interval IUCD PPIUCD
  • PDF (160 K)
  • XML
(2023). Evaluation Of Post-Partum IUCD (PPIUCD) Versus Interval IUCD (380A) Insertion. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 10(1), 2612-2617.
Dr. Parul Sharma, Dr. Kamakshi Mam, Dr. Mehak Khazanchi, Dr. Vanshika Gupta, Dr. Saagar Anand, Dr. Amita Gupta, Dr. Gokul Sharma .. "Evaluation Of Post-Partum IUCD (PPIUCD) Versus Interval IUCD (380A) Insertion". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 10, 1, 2023, 2612-2617.
(2023). 'Evaluation Of Post-Partum IUCD (PPIUCD) Versus Interval IUCD (380A) Insertion', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 10(1), pp. 2612-2617.
Evaluation Of Post-Partum IUCD (PPIUCD) Versus Interval IUCD (380A) Insertion. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2023; 10(1): 2612-2617.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 3
  • PDF Download: 38
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus