• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 10, Issue 1
  3. Author

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume10, Issue1

Comparison Of Phacotrabeculectomy And Conventional Combined Technique In Coexisting Glaucoma And Cataract Patients

    Meena Lakshman, Shamsheer R P .

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2023, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 4851-4855

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Background: To compare Phacotrabeculectomy and conventional combined technique in coexisting glaucoma and cataract patients.
Materials and Methods: Eighty- eight patients of primary open angle glaucoma with coexisting cataract of both genders were divided into 2 groups of 44 each. Group I patients were treated with Phacotrabeculectomy (PET) and group II patients with extracapsular lens extraction with IOL implantation with Phacotrabeculectomy (ECCE + Trabeculectomy). Parameters such as operative and postoperative complications, control of IOP and visual outcome was recorded at follow up 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months.
Results: Group I had 24 males and 20 females, group II had 18 males and 26 females. There was significant difference in post- operative IOP recorded at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months in both groups. The difference was significant (P< 0.05). Visual fields & fundus status was static seen in 100% at 1 week and 2 weeks in both groups, 95% at 4 weeks in both groups, 84% at 6 months in both groups and 80% at 12 months in both groups. It was progressive in 5% at 4 weeks in group I, 11% at 6 months in group I and 13% in group II and 15% at 12 months in group I and 17 in group II. Post- operative complications observed were uveitis in 1 and 3, shallow AC in 3 and 2, hyphaema in 2 and 5 and significant striate in 3 and 6 in group I and II respectively. The difference was significant (P< 0.05).
Conclusion: Phacotrabeculectomy provides effective and efficient visual recovery and adequate control of intraocular pressure as compare to conventional combined procedure.
Keywords:
    Phacotrabeculectomy intraocular pressure glaucoma Visual fields
  • PDF (327 K)
  • XML
(2023). Comparison Of Phacotrabeculectomy And Conventional Combined Technique In Coexisting Glaucoma And Cataract Patients. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 10(1), 4851-4855.
Meena Lakshman, Shamsheer R P .. "Comparison Of Phacotrabeculectomy And Conventional Combined Technique In Coexisting Glaucoma And Cataract Patients". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 10, 1, 2023, 4851-4855.
(2023). 'Comparison Of Phacotrabeculectomy And Conventional Combined Technique In Coexisting Glaucoma And Cataract Patients', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 10(1), pp. 4851-4855.
Comparison Of Phacotrabeculectomy And Conventional Combined Technique In Coexisting Glaucoma And Cataract Patients. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2023; 10(1): 4851-4855.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 5
  • PDF Download: 20
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus