• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 7, Issue 2
  3. Author

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume7, Issue2

A comparative evaluation of PRF, blood clot and collagen scaffold in regenerative endodontics

    Sravani Uppala

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2020, Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 3401-3410

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Aim:The present study was conducted evaluate the efficacy of revascularization procedures
for the management of traumatized immature, nonvital, infected permanent teeth.
Materials & Methods:24 adult patients age ranged 13-24 years of both genders with
immature necrotic permanent teeth were classified into 3 groups of 8 each. Group I used
platelet rich fibrin (PRF). Group II used blood clot and group III used sterile collagensponge
scaffold. Patients were recalled regularly and clinical and radiographic evaluation was
performed at 6 months and at 1 year.
Results:In group I, 20% teeth had good and 80% had excellent healing, in group II, 20% had
fair, 50% had good and 30% had excellent healing and in group III, 70% had good and 30%
had excellent healing. In group I, 90% teeth had fair and 10% had good root lengthening, in
group II, 20% had fair and 80% had good root lengthening and in group III, 71% had fair and
29% had good root lengthening. None of the group had excellent root lengthening. Apical
closure was good in 40% and excellent in 60% in group I, good in 25% and excellent in 75%
in group II and fair in 30%, good in 30% and excellent in 60% in group III. Dentinal wall
thickening in group I was fair in 30% and good in 70%, in group II, 50% had fair and 50%
had good and in group III, 30% had fair, 50% had good and 20% had excellent response.
Conclusion:Authors found that PRF and collagen was superior than blood clot in terms of
apical closure and healing. Regenerative healing with different scaffolds is useful method of
preserving immature non- vital permanent teeth.
Keywords:
    Apexification Necrotic teeth Regenerative Endodontics
  • PDF (285 K)
  • XML
(2020). A comparative evaluation of PRF, blood clot and collagen scaffold in regenerative endodontics. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(2), 3401-3410.
Sravani Uppala. "A comparative evaluation of PRF, blood clot and collagen scaffold in regenerative endodontics". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7, 2, 2020, 3401-3410.
(2020). 'A comparative evaluation of PRF, blood clot and collagen scaffold in regenerative endodontics', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(2), pp. 3401-3410.
A comparative evaluation of PRF, blood clot and collagen scaffold in regenerative endodontics. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2020; 7(2): 3401-3410.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 197
  • PDF Download: 448
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus