• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 7, Issue 11
  3. Author

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume7, Issue11

Comparison of manual orthodontic, powered and sonic tooth brushes in patients undergoing fixed orthodontics

    Zuber Ahamed Naqvi , Bader Abdullah Almehrej, Mohammad Abdulkarim Alrabeeah , Mohammed Ali Alshahrani

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2020, Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages 117-122

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Background: Good plaque control is an important factor in the maintenance of dental health during fixed appliance therapy.The present study was conducted to compare manual orthodontic, powered and sonic toothbrushes in patients undergoing fixed orthodontics. Materials & Methods: The present study was conducted on 60 patients undergoing fixed orthodontics of both genders. Patients were divided into 3 groups of 20. Group I patients were given manual orthodontic brushes, group II patients were given powered brushes and group III patients were given sonic powered brushes. Parameters such as plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) and interdental bleeding index were recorded at baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks recall visits after fixed appliance bonding. Results: The mean plaque index at baseline in group I was 1.18, in group II was 1.14 and in group III was 1.12, at 4 weeks was 1.06, 1.05 and 1.04 in group I, II and III respectively, at 8 weeks was 1.05, 1.04 and 1.04 in group I, II and III respectively. Difference within the group was significant (P< 0.05). The mean gingival index at baseline in group I was 1.10, in group II was 1.08 and in group III was 1.09, at 4 weeks was 1.06, 1.06 and 1.05 in group I, II and III respectively, at 8 weeks was 1.06, 1.05 and 1.05 in group I, II and III respectively. Difference within the group was significant (P< 0.05). The mean bleeding index at baseline in group I was 1.22, in group II was 1.19 and in group III was 1.20, at 4 weeks was 1.14, 1.08 and 1.11 in group I, II and III respectively, at 8 weeks was 0.12, 0.08 and 0.07 in group I, II and III respectively. Difference within the group was significant (P< 0.05). Conclusion: Authors found that sonic tooth brushes were effective in reducing all parameters followed by powered and manual brushes.
Keywords:
  • PDF (154 K)
  • XML
(2020). Comparison of manual orthodontic, powered and sonic tooth brushes in patients undergoing fixed orthodontics. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(11), 117-122.
Zuber Ahamed Naqvi , Bader Abdullah Almehrej, Mohammad Abdulkarim Alrabeeah , Mohammed Ali Alshahrani. "Comparison of manual orthodontic, powered and sonic tooth brushes in patients undergoing fixed orthodontics". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7, 11, 2020, 117-122.
(2020). 'Comparison of manual orthodontic, powered and sonic tooth brushes in patients undergoing fixed orthodontics', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(11), pp. 117-122.
Comparison of manual orthodontic, powered and sonic tooth brushes in patients undergoing fixed orthodontics. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2020; 7(11): 117-122.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 218
  • PDF Download: 411
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus