• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 7, Issue 3
  3. Authors

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume7, Issue3

Assessment of Root Resorption between Piezocision and Micro-osteoperforation during retraction - A Clinical Study

    Dr. Vidyesh Durga Nadkerny Dr. Soumya Gupta Dr. Amit A Akolkar Dr. Shefali Kadam Dr. Smriti Priya Dr. Rahul Gote

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2020, Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 4642-4647

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Background: The present study was conducted to compare root resorption between Micro-osteoperforation (MOP) and Piezocision (PzC) assisted orthodontics.
Materials & Methods: 36 patients requiring orthodontic treatment were divided into two groups of 18 each. Group I was treated using MOP in one side while the other side served as control. Group II was treated with PzC in one side with no intervention done on the other side. Radiographs were obtained before and after canine retraction to calculate amount of RR.
Results: Root resorption in experiment side in group I before canine retraction found to be 27.90 mm and after canine retraction was 27.42 mm and on control side pre- operatively was 27.86 mm and post- operatively was 27.36 mm. The difference was non- significant (P> 0.05). Root resorption in experiment side in group II pre- operatively found to be 26.76 mm and post- operatively was 26.62 mm and on control side pre- operatively was 27.80 mm and post- operatively was 25.41 mm. The difference was significant (P< 0.05).
Conclusion: Authors found significant differences in apical RR were observed between the PzC group and the control group after canine retraction. Significant apical RR were observed in the experimental PzC side compared to experimental MOP side postoperatively after canine retraction.
Keywords:
    Canine retraction Micro-osteoperforation Piezocision
  • PDF (248 K)
  • XML
(2020). Assessment of Root Resorption between Piezocision and Micro-osteoperforation during retraction - A Clinical Study. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(3), 4642-4647.
Dr. Vidyesh Durga Nadkerny; Dr. Soumya Gupta; Dr. Amit A Akolkar; Dr. Shefali Kadam; Dr. Smriti Priya; Dr. Rahul Gote. "Assessment of Root Resorption between Piezocision and Micro-osteoperforation during retraction - A Clinical Study". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7, 3, 2020, 4642-4647.
(2020). 'Assessment of Root Resorption between Piezocision and Micro-osteoperforation during retraction - A Clinical Study', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(3), pp. 4642-4647.
Assessment of Root Resorption between Piezocision and Micro-osteoperforation during retraction - A Clinical Study. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2020; 7(3): 4642-4647.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 250
  • PDF Download: 317
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus