• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 7, Issue 7
  3. Authors

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume7, Issue7

Foley’s Catheter And Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone For Labour Induction

    Dr. Shikha Toshniwal Dr. Saunitra Inamdar Dr. Himanshi Agarwal

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2020, Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages 2150-2157

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Background- The labour induction becomes necessary when the continuing the pregnancy could result in maternal and fetal complications. Cervical ripening is essential for success of normal delivery, so attempts are made to ripen the cervix in a small span of time.
Aim- To study the comparative impact of “Transcervical Foley's Catheter with vaginal misoprostol on labour induction versus vaginal misoprostol alone” at or after 36 weeks of gestation.
Method- A cross- sectional study conducted in the rural area of India involves 120 full term pregnant females selected by systematic random sampling technique and the labour will be induced either by Foley’s catheter along with misoprostol or misoprostol alone.
Result - In females induced with the Foley catheter along with vaginal misoprostol in both
Primigravida and multigravida females, the time from induction to delivery is predicted to be substantially reduced. Conclusion- Due to synergistic effect of intracervical Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour, the time from induction to delivery interval will be reduced, prolongation of labour will be decreased and unnecessary caesarian section can be avoided.
Keywords:
    Foley’s catheter misoprostol labour induction
  • PDF (354 K)
  • XML
(2020). Foley’s Catheter And Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone For Labour Induction. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(7), 2150-2157.
Dr. Shikha Toshniwal; Dr. Saunitra Inamdar; Dr. Himanshi Agarwal. "Foley’s Catheter And Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone For Labour Induction". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7, 7, 2020, 2150-2157.
(2020). 'Foley’s Catheter And Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone For Labour Induction', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(7), pp. 2150-2157.
Foley’s Catheter And Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone For Labour Induction. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2020; 7(7): 2150-2157.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 135
  • PDF Download: 282
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus