• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 7, Issue 3
  3. Authors

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume7, Issue3

Comparison Of Two Different Osteosynthesis Technique To Evaluate Skeletal Stability In Advancement Genioplasty: A Retrospective Study

    Dr. Manoj Kumar Rawat Dr. Mohammed Ibrahim Dr. Hemanadh Kolli Dr.Sriram Choudary Nuthalapati Dr Shilpa Sunil Khanna Dr. Gowri Swaminatham Pendyala Dr. Rahul VC Tiwari

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2020, Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 5685-5690

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the skeletal stability in wiring and plating fixation technique after genioplasty advancement. Methodology: Patients who came for repair of cleft alveolus were enrolled within the study. Retrospectively all the Lateral Cephalogram were taken for patients undergoing Orthognathic Surgery; pre-operatively, 1-week post-operative and 1-year post-operatively after advancement genioplasty. Two groups were divided in keeping with the osteosynthesis technique used, Group 1- Wiring Osteosynthesis (n=38) and Group 2- Miniplate Osteosynthesis (n=38). Linear measurements were done after tracing all the Lateral Cephalograms. Results: In the semi rigid group (wire fixation) a mean horizontal advancement of 5.97 mm was in the midst of a relapse of 1.623 mm. The mean superior repositioning of menton was 0.7 mm. This was in the middle of a relapse of 0.3 mm during a period of 1 year. Within the rigid group (miniplate) a mean horizontal advancement of 4.815 mm was in the course of a relapse of 0.2 mm. The mean superior repositioning of menton was 0.975 mm. Conclusion: The results of our study and our clinical experience indicate that this single plate is a particularly simple and extremely useful method of stabilization.
Keywords:
    Genioplasty orthognathic surgery osteosynthesis
  • PDF (232 K)
  • XML
(2021). Comparison Of Two Different Osteosynthesis Technique To Evaluate Skeletal Stability In Advancement Genioplasty: A Retrospective Study. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(3), 5685-5690.
Dr. Manoj Kumar Rawat; Dr. Mohammed Ibrahim; Dr. Hemanadh Kolli; Dr.Sriram Choudary Nuthalapati; Dr Shilpa Sunil Khanna; Dr. Gowri Swaminatham Pendyala; Dr. Rahul VC Tiwari. "Comparison Of Two Different Osteosynthesis Technique To Evaluate Skeletal Stability In Advancement Genioplasty: A Retrospective Study". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7, 3, 2021, 5685-5690.
(2021). 'Comparison Of Two Different Osteosynthesis Technique To Evaluate Skeletal Stability In Advancement Genioplasty: A Retrospective Study', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(3), pp. 5685-5690.
Comparison Of Two Different Osteosynthesis Technique To Evaluate Skeletal Stability In Advancement Genioplasty: A Retrospective Study. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2021; 7(3): 5685-5690.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 157
  • PDF Download: 318
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus